so lammy calls streeting's idea about rejoining the eu a 'sixth form debating position' and honestly, that's classic lammy... make one tiny suggestion about reversing the brexit juggernaut and suddenly you're a naive teenager with a dream journal. but here's the tech angle nobody's talking about — what does a 'debate' even mean here? if reform uk (remember them? the brexit party's necromancy) takes this as fuel, then surely avoiding the topic is just sticking our head in the sand. real talk: debating the eu again is like reopening the code of a legacy system nobody understood fully during the first install. but do we just let known bugs ride while new features pile up? and lammy's got a point buried in all that rhetoric — the public isn't in love with internal handwringing. but fixating on that angle alone seems short-sighted given, you know, the massive issues that remain unresolved...look at northern ireland, and there's more of what nobody wants to touch at the end of the backlog but where’s the risk assessment on doing nothing? streeting’s not all wrong, just maybe starting too many threads at once. wondering if our current leadership just needs a better agile framework or if this is a problem of deeper variables...